Blinded by the light

Watched “Blinded by the Light” last night. Probably the film won’t be a candidate for any awards, but the story line of a young Pakistani teenager trying to find his way in an unfriendly small English town and Springsteen’s music — I’m a big Bruce fan to begin with — really resonated with me. It made me laugh, cry a bit, and, notwithstanding the very obvious differences between his younger years and mine, it took me back to my teen years when the combination of small town living, the many prohibitions of the Catholic Church, sudden loss of my mother, a father who drank too much, and a step mother who was a task master left me feeling out of joint and in a box. I didn’t have Bruce Springsteen’s songs and lyrics at that time to give voice and authenticity to my feelings and dreams, but I did have those early rock and rollers — Elvis, Chuck Berry, and others — who could shake rattle and roll and some hard scrabble, beer drinking friends who brought some light into my life.

60 plus years later, I would like to say that I have it all figured out and everything is good, but that would be One Big Fat Lie.

 

Protecting one’s flank

Paul Krugman once again eviscerates the Republican Party. And to think that many on the left for a long time said there was no difference between the GOP and the Democrats. The persistence of this notion in left circles lies in the fact that too many on the left fear being tagged as insufficiently radical, as an opportunist. Thus protecting one’s left flank became a preoccupation, far more important than soberly looking at reality. This isn’t the only reason for this blind spot, but it wasn’t a minor factor either.

Too narrow and simply mistaken

To say that a process of class de-alignment is occurring across Europe and the U.S. without any qualification strikes me as one sided at best. At worst it’s filled with a narrow, old, and simply mistaken understanding of the contemporary working class and its changing profile in these countries.

Probably not much

I read an article in Jacobin last night that was a diatribe against, of all people (or should I say candidates) Elizabeth Warren. Her candidacy, it was said, has no potential to end the “class de-alignment” that structures U.S. politics in various ways. Only Bernie’s candidacy possesses that potential, even if Bernie is “only” a social democrat. I can’t recall any mention of the urgency of defeating Trump and the necessity of broad democratic unity that should flow from that imperative.

There is a lot to take issue with in this article, but thinking more about it, I began to wonder how much such thinking resonates with people in general and young people in particular. Probably not much.

Reprise of 2016?

I’m afraid that if Bernie doesn’t secure the Democratic Party’s nomination (and Bernie would make a great candidate), some on the ideological left will take a pass on the general election. They may vote, but do little, practical speaking, in the months leading up to election day, while damming the nominee with faint praise. It will be a reprise of 2016, although lesser so, I suspect. It is hard to sustain such a position in the face of the prospect of a second term for Trump with all its attendant dangers.