Biden has the good sense to recognize that the projection of US power in the contemporary world is increasingly limited. Many of his critics haven’t yet come to that realization.

“The extent to which the media is privileging voices who have gotten this wrong for years is ridiculous. What we’re seeing is an attempt by the Washington foreign policy establishment to expiate its sins of over 20 years by putting this on the Biden administration.”

I’m for vaccination and workplace mandates. When the exercise of someone’s “personal freedom” – refusing vaccination and mask wearing – endangers the health (possibly lives) of others, disrupts the workplace and social life generally, and cripples the economy, I find it hard to defend that “freedom.” In nearly every direction we turn, we can find examples where government mandates (or laws) restricting personal behavior (or freedom) for the greater social good. We aren’t “free” to run stop signs or drive drunk or enter schools unannounced for obvious reasons that no one contests. I’m well aware that a tension can exist between personal rights and freedoms and collective/social rights and freedoms, but in this case, the tension isn’t so apparent to me. To claim a “right or freedom to infect and disrupt” the lives of others just doesn’t register in my world.

It is undeniable that the great social movements of the last half of the 20th century changed the terrain on which millions live and how they understand the world in profound and enduring ways. And yet their transformative capacity, that is their ability to move to a new, higher stage of struggle and possibility, was circumscribed by the limited participation of the main sections of the labor movement. Few articulated this better than MLK in the 1960s. What was true in the last century is no less true in this century.

It was a colossal mistake, but not surprising decision that US forces entered Afghanistan with “guns ablazing” and in the language of fighting “international terrorism” nearly two decades ago, after years earlier destabilizing a secular democratic-progressive, anti-imperialist government and country. (I met Babrak Kamal, that government’s first Prime Minister in Moscow in 1981 ) But does anyone think that a slower drawn down and exit from Afghanistan now would result in something much different from what we seeing? The only alternative to what is happening is endless occupation. And that we know after nearly 20 years is no alternative